top of page

Don't Hire a BDR. Hire Two

General, Leadership

Who is it for?

Founders and revenue leaders hiring first BDRs, AEs, or new market roles

When to use?

First sales hires or revenue targets hinging on a critical role succeeding

16 Mar 2026

Early sales hires rarely fail because of effort; they fail because they are isolated, unsupported, and untested. Hiring in pairs accelerates learning, improves execution, and reduces the commercial risk of a single point of failure.

There's a simple truth about hiring salespeople that many companies overlook: two people hired together will almost always outperform one hired alone - not just in aggregate, but individually.

Two BDRs learning together learn faster. They compare notes on what's working. They troubleshoot together. For your first BDRs especially - who need to blaze trails, create process, and refine messaging - doing this alone is brutally hard. Having a partner in that journey dramatically improves both their chances of success. Add in the healthy competition that naturally develops, and you've created a performance environment that a single hire simply can't replicate.

Two AEs give you great internal comparison. There's also a management benefit that's easy to underestimate. When you have two people in the same role, you can see performance differences clearly and help where needed. With only one hire, you might miss key signs.

Less risk. Hiring success rates in early stage businesses, particularly where BDR processes and management are still being built, mean that hiring in pairs significantly improves your odds of having at least one successful hire. The question isn't "can we afford to hire two?" It's "can we afford the risk of hiring only one?"

This scenario plays out constantly. Very recently I worked with a Series A client who hired what looked like a very promising first enterprise AE. After several months, for various reasons, it didn't work out. Their planned 3x revenue growth - from $2M to $6M ARR - was suddenly thrown into doubt. Six months of momentum, gone. A second hire running in parallel would have been cheap insurance against that outcome.

The operational efficiency case is stronger than it first appears. Hiring two people instead of one is not twice the work - the job spec is the same, you're sourcing from the same pool, and you're running the same process. Whereas re-running a process six months later doubles the work. Onboarding is similar - the induction, the training, the ramp process are all largely the same whether one person is sitting in the room or two.

Key times to lean into this

  • Entering a new market or segment where you're still figuring out the playbook

  • Hiring your first person in a role - first BDR, first AE, first enterprise seller

  • Scaling rapidly and can't afford delays

  • When your revenue targets depend on this hire succeeding

If you're in any of these situations, hiring in pairs isn't a luxury -  it's the efficient way to drive success for your company and your team.

Whether you're hiring one or two, make sure your recruitment process is rigorous. I'd be happy to share my interviewing toolkits if that would be useful - just let me know.

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Comment here or reply.

If this was useful, stay close to the thinking.

Get practical GTM insights and strategic breakdowns in your inbox. Weekly.

Related Posts

GTM & Strategy, Leadership

2026-07-20

AE headcount is not a revenue plan

Starting with the number of AEs needed when building your revenue plan assumes pipeline, hiring speed, ramp time, and operational readiness will all hold. Most of the time, at least one of them doesn't - and the cost of being wrong is significant.

Leadership

12 Jul 2026

How do you know if your team is coachable?

Most managers say they value coachability but have never actually defined it. Without a clear standard, you cannot hire for it, test for it, or hold anyone to it - including yourself.

Leadership

2026-07-06

After 30 days, you should know if an AE is going to make it

Most sales managers treat the first 30 days as a test of the new AE. It is equally a test of the company. By day 30 you cannot know if they will hit quota, but you can know whether they are learning, building pipeline, and responding to coaching - and whether your onboarding gave them a fair chance.

All Blog Posts →

Relevant resources

Tools and insights for improving your revenue engine

Demo Training

Coach winning demos

Discovery Training

Qualify deeper, faster

AE Toolkit

Hire top performers

See more resources 

bottom of page