top of page

Wasted trials that you've been granted(*).

General

Who is it for?

For sellers qualifying complex deals and managing stakeholder risk.

When to use?

Use when you need to surface decision dynamics, urgency, and what would trigger action.

1 Sept 2025

Trials can create false confidence. This post questions what a granted trial actually proves about intent.

Trials are often necessary (although not always – see later **). When they are necessary, they are often resource hungry for both the vendor and the prospect. Yet, astonishingly, all too frequently both the vendor and the prospect will jump in without

* clearly defining the process

* agreeing who is responsible for what

* deciding what constitutes success.

And on top of that, companies will go ahead without even getting executive commitment that this is worth the effort.

The result is inevitable.

* Trials which drift and provide no definitive results for the prospect.

* Trials which show good results, but take an unnecessary time to get there.

* And worst of all, trials which complete with decent results and the prospect doesn’t move ahead.

What is particularly surprising is that vendors and buyers which invest their resources very carefully, defining requirements and expected results in every other area, do not apply the same to trials.

I recommend applying following criteria before investing any time in a trial.

* You have spoken to an Economic Buyer who has confirmed that the business case for this product makes sense and if the trial is successful they will move towards a commercial relationship.

* You’ve agreed with that Economic Buyer and with those who will be involved in the trial what success looks like. Ideally, hard numbers, if necessary something slightly more judgement related, but be absolutely clear.

* You have commitment from both sides to invest the correct resources to make this trial successful.

If your contacts tell you that they need to do the trial to show value before engaging with the Economic Buyer, alarm bells should be ringing.

If you cannot agree what success looks like – and that you’re confident you can deliver that success – there is absolutely no point in proceeding.

If nobody will commit to provide the correct resources throughout the process, run for the hills.

* Did you recognise the pop reference?

** Many businesses fall into the process of doing trials. There are plenty of businesses where they are not necessary. Instead, agree what good looks like, provide good references from other customers, roll out live, and have clear success criteria which allow the client to step out of the contract if you fail to deliver. That way, both the buyer and the vendor will be much more committed to success.

If this was useful, stay close to the thinking.

Get practical GTM insights and strategic breakdowns in your inbox. Weekly.

Get the insights

Related Posts

General

28 Jul 2025

Maximize the founder's value in sales — forever

Founder involvement in sales can compound value or cap it. This article examines how to scale beyond personality.

General

21 Jul 2025

The key question every sales leader should ask

Sales leadership clarity starts with one question. This piece outlines the inquiry that reframes performance conversations.

General

2 Jun 2025

Positioning: are you talking about your product effectively?

Positioning determines how your product is interpreted. This post examines whether you’re describing features or outcomes.

All Blog Posts →

Relevant resources

Tools and insights for improving your revenue engine

Demo Training

Coach winning demos

Discovery Training

Qualify deeper, faster

AE Toolkit

Hire top performers

See more resources 

bottom of page